Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Feb. 4, 2022

Created

Wed Jan 12 20:55:38 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ProfTolson @jamalgreene @ProfGuyCharles @rickhasen @ElectProject you can frame the argument in originalist, madisonian terms. and the alternative to preserving this implied political question doctrine + congressional action interpretation of the GC is... federal military occupation of the states, reconstruction style? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 12, 2022

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ProfTolson @jamalgreene @ProfGuyCharles @rickhasen @ElectProject i think there are clever reasons why they *could* be inclined to do so under certain circumstances. thinking strictly from the standpoint of a conservative justice, the GC is a 'safer' basis for voting rights laws than an expansive interpretation of the reconstruction amendments — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 12, 2022

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ProfTolson @jamalgreene @ProfGuyCharles @rickhasen @ElectProject and the hypotheticals cases be presented in very conservative-friendly terms. imagine if, in 1800, the NY state leg drew one LD around the largest 100 landholder homes, LD for the rest of the state. you can either try and let congress ban that, or have a civil war — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 12, 2022