Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 24, 2021

Created

Tue Oct 05 22:20:08 +0000 2021

Likes

101

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Realistically, the courts would eventually intervene--but it's not quite enough to be sure. The state laws are often very vague, and often don't have clear evidentiary standards. Litigation could take longer than the safe-harbor deadline. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 5, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The refusal to certify an election on a pretextual basis could change the game as we saw it in 20. It would around flip the politics of the fight, by denying the winning party the appearance of what was their most important advantage in '20: the reality of an uncontested election — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 5, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

More importantly, refusal to certify would immediately become a plausible pretextual basis for a state legislature to intervene, or simply refuse to send electors, esp if the courts and election officials are playing badminton with the outcome. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 5, 2021