Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 5, 2021

Created

Sat Sep 18 15:56:10 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The risk I wonder about: do you wind up reversing non-coverage bias and bias the sample toward the non-covered population, even if only slightly, if you dedup and weight the RBS sample to the full partisan file, and don't have a party weight on the non-RBS component — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 18, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

I could go down a 50 tweet rabbit hole thinking through whether this design holds up as a theoretical proposition. Maybe I'd decide it did by the end of the rabbit hole. I'm not going to, though, because I don't think (?) there's any material consequence. It's just odd — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 18, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Re-reading the methodology, I misinterpreted the dedup initially—they’re still calling RDD respondents who have a number on the file as long as they’re not in the RBS frame. Reduces the risks—and benefit tbh—of the approach — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 18, 2021