Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 12, 2021

Created

Mon Jul 12 20:55:24 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@JakeMGrumbach i think that's probably true. i also think it's probably true that there are legislative costs to spending six months on a nonviable package, especially when that package yields few natural paths forward (and had substantive issues, too) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 12, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@JakeMGrumbach i agree in a narrow sense: i don't think they left money on the table, as i don't think they had a winning card to play. they knew it, and chose not to push HR1 in a serious way — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 12, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@JakeMGrumbach @jon_m_rob don't take this the wrong way, but i'm pretty astonished you think that! it'd get it if you thought HR1 was a gamble that was worth the risk, or it had certain benefits for messaging and coalition building that matter if you think essentially nothing is possible. but zero costs? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 12, 2021