Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked July 1, 2021

Created

Thu Jul 01 14:32:48 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Given that most voting in 1982 was election day in-person voting, it's hard to see the court rejecting time/place/manner restrictions on convenience voting, like those the GOP has proposed over the last few years — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 1, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

2) The court cares about whether something was standard practice in 1982, when section 2 was amended. So if it's still as easy or easier to vote than it was in 1982, it's probably ok. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 1, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

3) The court cares about all the opportunities to vote, not just the burden of one provision. It implies that so long as some minimum standard of access has been assured, other restrictions are ok — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 1, 2021