Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 29, 2021

Created

Tue Jun 29 13:26:09 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Emphasis on relatively, ofc. Hardly likely. But compared to other starting-points, it's --it's narrow, digestable and negotiable --it doesn't do anything with huge partisan consequences, like end gerrymandering; --it's not tied up with the 2020 voting wars, like mail voting — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 29, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Leaving the details aside for a second (see rest of thread), the basic formula here--voter ID for a basic voting rights protection (not expansion) + subversion safeguards--is a *relatively* plausible blueprint https://t.co/uHKyIwals1 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 29, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

In terms of the details, it seems to me that there are two fairly serious issues. --I don't really think criminalization of election subversion is an effective means of tackling the issue; --I don't think progressives would impose new ID requirements for felon enfranchisement — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 29, 2021