Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 24, 2021

Created

Thu Jun 24 21:15:08 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@jbview @hakeemjefferson @BrendanNyhan @jon_m_rob @gelliottmorris @mattyglesias @rickhasen yes, that effort will probably fail--though you never know--esp if your aiming for something anything like HR1. but failure is prerequisite to your chance at 50: you hope that you fail in such a convincing and earnest way that Manchin revises his views on the filibuster. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 24, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@jbview @hakeemjefferson @BrendanNyhan @jon_m_rob @gelliottmorris @mattyglesias @rickhasen at first glance, it seems there are two ways to pass a bill: --eliminate the filibuster; --get 60 votes. But the guy you need to eliminate the filibuster says he wants you to try to get 60 votes. So any path to passage starts the same way — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 24, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@jbview @hakeemjefferson @BrendanNyhan @jon_m_rob @gelliottmorris @mattyglesias @rickhasen HR1 is the opposite, and as a consequence it (and the Manchin compromises) is a doomed vehicle for abandoning the filibuster, even though you think that eliminating the filibuster is the path to HR1/Manchin comp. passage — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 24, 2021