Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 6, 2021

Created

Sun Jun 06 14:22:19 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

A second model is a very narrow, consensus driven bill that might still establish some baseline guardrails against subversion and maybe suppression. Progressives would say it doesn't go anywhere near far enough, but they wouldn't have to sacrifice anything — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 6, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The GOP has few incentives to say yes to a deal, so the Democrats would probably need to give more than they get, at least in GOP eyes. The opportunity, theoretically, is if Dems recognized they weren't really giving much on something like mail voting--as most analysis suggests — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 6, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Progressives would also hope that there's some small chance that the failure of any of these initiatives--particularly the consensus driven one--might prod Manchin to reconsider his position on the filibuster, once other options have really been exhausted — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 6, 2021