Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 5, 2021

Created

Sat Jun 05 15:08:00 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

I should note that this is true under *any* scenario--even the one where Manchin gives up the filibuster. In my replies, there seems to be a belief that if the Dems axe the filibuster that HR1 can just pass. And that's not so. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 5, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

As painful as reformists will find it, the narrower bill suggested by the NYT--limit subversion, suppression, and gerrymandering, plus preclearence--is more like the $2 trillion dollar starting point. Even from that starting point, most elements would wind up compromised away. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 5, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

This is part of a larger misperception, that the filibuster will be killed so progressives can enact progressive bills. That may be the ultimate effect of axing the filibuster. But that's not how the filibuster will die, if it can be killed — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 5, 2021