Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 5, 2021

Created

Sat Jun 05 15:07:58 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

At first, it's easy to see why you could think of HR1 as a broad bill that's the basis for a negotiation that eventually gets to something viable--like Biden starting off at $2 trillion on something in hopes of $1 trillion. In this view, narrowing is a premature concession. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 5, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

This is one of the clearest summaries of one of the more interesting critiques of the NYT call for a narrower, targeted and viable HR1. But to me, it's very hard to read the reporting on HR1 and think it's the right interpretation of the politics here https://t.co/lKOIsCvVdk — PolitiTweet.org

He certainly hasn’t said so. Until he does, these arguments are just preemptive, premature concessions.

Posted June 5, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

But if you read the articles about HR1 in Congress, it's fairly clear that it's not on track to even serve this limited purpose. It's basically DOA, and it is not poised to serve as the basis for serious negotiations. It's more like the Green New Deal than a $2 tn infra. offer — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 5, 2021