Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 3, 2021

Created

Thu Jun 03 21:58:40 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

One is certification: could partisan officials find a pretextual basis to ignore election results, like un- or poorly- evidenced fraud or theft allegations, whether it's about Diabold in Ohio '04 or Trump's claims in '20? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

A successful act of election subversion would be legal by definition--while an illegal act of subversion would basically be a coup--so you can't prohibit it as such. But it seems to me that there are several categories of subversion and possible remedies https://t.co/Q1gw0MAA4n — PolitiTweet.org

@billscher @Nate_Cohn Is there even an agreed-upon definition of what should be considered, by the law, election subversion?

Posted June 3, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Second is tabulation: could partisan officials disqualify ballots on a pretextual basis, like matched lists or allegations about Fulton County? (This is sort of like decertification, but here subversion effects the tabulated count) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2021