Profile Image

Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated No
Last Checked June 3, 2021

Created

Thu Jun 03 21:10:41 +0000 2021

Likes

0

Retweets

0

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

RT @billscher: @Nate_Cohn FYI Stacey Abrams expects anti-subversion amendments to HR1 but didn’t make any proposals as to what they should… — PolitiTweet.org

Vote Save America @votesaveamerica

.@staceyabrams on the need to add provisions to HR1 to prevent election subversion: "When laws are this porous, th… https://t.co/C4NnM3JSvg

Posted June 3, 2021 Retweet

Preceded By

Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

RT @maggieNYT: Oh https://t.co/SZcbqDQsOx — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 3, 2021 Retweet

Followed By

Profile Image

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

A successful act of election subversion would be legal by definition--while an illegal act of subversion would basically be a coup--so you can't prohibit it as such. But it seems to me that there are several categories of subversion and possible remedies https://t.co/Q1gw0MAA4n — PolitiTweet.org

Paella_Enthusiast @winterlikejune

@billscher @Nate_Cohn Is there even an agreed-upon definition of what should be considered, by the law, election subversion?

Posted June 3, 2021