Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 1, 2021

Created

Tue Jun 01 16:47:50 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ProfNickStephan that's especially so if you agree--and i'm not sure that you do--that the likeliest element of this hypothetical proposal to actually be enacted is the subversion stuff that's not really in HR1 today — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 1, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ProfNickStephan to me, a bill that contained those three central aims--minimum standards for voting access; an end to gerrymandering; election subversion--would not be recognizable as HR1, either in terms of its provisions or the central thinking behind the law — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 1, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Some people think election subversion would be very easy to address. Others think it's hard. The truth is that there's just not a lot of serious thinking on it, so it's hard to say. There's no proposal. There's no white paper. There's no journal article. https://t.co/MqTiNpD5Pn — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn It wouldn't take much to combat election subversion. Just some directives or minimum standards for ballo… https://t.co/hG3gQZhaiq

Posted June 1, 2021