Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 1, 2021

Created

Tue Jun 01 16:42:54 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ProfNickStephan well we're largely on the same page about what a narrower bill would contain, but we disagree on the arguably semantic distinction of whether that's tantamount to abandoning HR1/designing a new bill or just amending it — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 1, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ProfNickStephan if HR1 wasn't DOA, that would be another way to go about it: make it even bigger. but as it is, HR1 is basically DOA and prioritization will be necessary for its viability. and if the thing to prioritize isn't really in HR1, then you're just talking about a different bill — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 1, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ProfNickStephan to me, a bill that contained those three central aims--minimum standards for voting access; an end to gerrymandering; election subversion--would not be recognizable as HR1, either in terms of its provisions or the central thinking behind the law — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 1, 2021