Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked June 1, 2021

Created

Tue Jun 01 15:06:46 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@richardmskinner others would know better than me, but i'd think the major goals would be to protect the integrity of federal election administration, tabulation and certification; means range from comprehensive fed regulations to requiring nonpartisan admin (or else submit to preclearence idk) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 1, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

I doubt anything can get 60 votes right now. But if there's any chance to get Manchin off the filibuster, it would be far, far, far likelier to happen with something that's narrowly tailored to protect democracy than a bill like HR1 https://t.co/NolCuUF9Zm — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn "has a better chance of passing"? If you believe this, you don't understand the GOP effort to destroy our democracy.

Posted June 1, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@richardmskinner a broader bill could require nonpartisan redistricting and minimum standards for ballot access (though i find it harder to think about to craft that if the goal is to protect against current 'suppression' laws, unless it's through a ban on retrogression in some way) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 1, 2021