Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked May 18, 2021

Created

Tue May 18 14:49:35 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@RyanDEnos @ltthompso @leedrutman looking further through the documentation, the design is better than the summary (or my summation of the summary) made it sound--many of the questions are relatively factual, to the extent they can be. someone who disagreed could probably find a methodological basis for doing so — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 18, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@RyanDEnos @ltthompso @leedrutman certainly, but i do think it's a case where one can disagree with the findings--or if you prefer, the expert ratings--without resorting to a methodological indictment of the study, unless the experts themselves offered some rigorous basis for their ratings — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 18, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ltthompso @RyanDEnos @leedrutman i don't know for sure, but my guess is that if you took the questionnaire (which i bet could be arranged!) you might disagree as much with the computation of the scale, based on your answers, as you disagreed with the experts on the answers — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 18, 2021