Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked April 6, 2021

Created

Tue Apr 06 14:30:12 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Yes, but not for reasons that are relevant here. Congress could pass a law adding a layer of federal preclearance for decertification https://t.co/DxFaW1KRYa — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn Nate, Section 5 was struck down by #SCOTUS in #Shelby https://t.co/w6Awtb7xpp

Posted April 6, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

As a result, the proposals for a slimmed down HR1 don't usually even include the provisions in HR1 that are relevant for protecting against election subversion — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 6, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@OklahomaPerson depends on the composition of the body that's responsible for clearing certification in federal elections. can be nonpartisan, etc — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 6, 2021