Nate Cohn

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@mcpli @GMikeParsons @davidshor @NLVWarren @imillhiser @jon_m_rob @mattyglesias @DLind as it is, i don't think the per se test is coherent. i don't think it's even obviously a test, as written; i think it alludes to some semi-defined and potentially contradictory tests. i do think the efficiency gap, whatever its merits or dismerits, is a test and a coherent one — PolitiTweet.org

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@ProfNickStephan @mcpli @GMikeParsons @davidshor @NLVWarren @imillhiser @jon_m_rob @mattyglesias @DLind for me, such a rewrite would need to a) establish that violating any of these tests would constitute undue disadvantage, if that's the intent and b) add specificity about what it takes to violate the non-EG tests, given who will be interpreting it — PolitiTweet.org