Nate Cohn

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@GMikeParsons @davidshor @NLVWarren @mcpli @imillhiser @jon_m_rob @mattyglesias @DLind so if there was a narrower and clearer rule (say one or two seats lost, depending on size of state, per the efficiency gap with presidential election data, which is something i can calculate pretty quickly when i make a map), i think you'd have something more useful — PolitiTweet.org

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@mcpli @GMikeParsons @davidshor @NLVWarren @imillhiser @jon_m_rob @mattyglesias @DLind as it is, i don't think the per se test is coherent. i don't think it's even obviously a test, as written; i think it alludes to some semi-defined and potentially contradictory tests. i do think the efficiency gap, whatever its merits or dismerits, is a test and a coherent one — PolitiTweet.org