Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked April 2, 2021

Created

Thu Mar 11 19:00:32 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@GMikeParsons @davidshor @NLVWarren @mcpli @imillhiser @jon_m_rob @mattyglesias @DLind i think if your narrow rule was clear, i'd agree. but instead you've piled all the different metrics into one semi-coherent and potentially conflicting rule — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 11, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@davidshor @NLVWarren @mcpli @GMikeParsons @imillhiser @jon_m_rob @mattyglesias @DLind a 'totality of evidence' standard feels like what you might have hoped the court to adopt in the partisan gerrymandering cases in the absence of a clear constitutional or legislative criteria, but here you can just specify the criteria! — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 11, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@GMikeParsons @davidshor @NLVWarren @mcpli @imillhiser @jon_m_rob @mattyglesias @DLind so in effect i think your narrow rule is less of a rule and more just specifying some of the evidence that could be employed as part of the ToC standard — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 11, 2021