Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 20, 2021

Created

Fri Feb 05 15:40:43 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The case *for* that seems obvious: there is only a risk of COVID/vaccine distribution dollars coming through faster, as there's no delay on the reconciliation resolution and you could add in the vaccine dollars if they were negotiating in bad faith. So what is case against? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 5, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Here's a very narrow, clarifying question (since many think any bipartisan engagement means ACA repeat): what was the case against moving *just* the COVID/vaccine dollars through regular order (which the GOP 10 agreed on), while continuing to move on reconciliation resolution? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 5, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@poniewozik I think it's a good assumption that you keep Manchin et al. for reconciliation, esp given the tweet at the outset, but that seems like something the White House is capable of evaluating — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 5, 2021