Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 20, 2021

Created

Fri Feb 05 15:23:48 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

If you push a 1400 bill through regular order in February and it fails, you do 2000 through reconciliation in March and say the increased number is to cover the delay in relief https://t.co/xkc6TJWFV1 — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn How would $2k checks be more likely through a bipartisan deal worth only $1 trillion? Or even $1.5 trill… https://t.co/vLx9M9e80f

Posted Feb. 5, 2021

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The case against it mainly boils down to delaying the package as a whole, but: --Democrats still control timing, and can bolt whenever conditions merit it --Much of the package isn't *that* time sensitive --Delay can be the excuse that lets progressives get to 2000 dollar checks — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 5, 2021

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Here's a very narrow, clarifying question (since many think any bipartisan engagement means ACA repeat): what was the case against moving *just* the COVID/vaccine dollars through regular order (which the GOP 10 agreed on), while continuing to move on reconciliation resolution? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 5, 2021