Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 3, 2022

Created

Wed Dec 02 18:29:07 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

But I don't want to debate about whether the 'unknown' vote is 26 or 35% black, or whatever, because a) it's not knowable (they're unknown!); b) it doesn't make a difference: all of the hard, factual ways of analyzing the electorate show a dip in the Black share of voters — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Well, as I said, if you go down the road of allocating the 'unknown' voters you wind up having to debate about it. The data at my disposal says they're no more likely to be black--and probably less--than voters of 'known' race. https://t.co/JJPeUpuKBP — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn How does it not materially affect your findings? If 100% of 'unknown' voters turned out to be black, wou… https://t.co/uAoju4QCmt

Posted Dec. 2, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Ultimately, dwelling on this very legitimate question winds up obscuring from an all but uncontested conclusions. It let's you say you think the analysis is 'wrong,' without being willing to say the conclusion is wrong--and in this case, actually stipulating it's right — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2020 Hibernated Just a Typo