Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 12, 2022

Created

Wed Dec 02 18:10:05 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

As long as I've been at the Times, none of my GA analyses have allocated 'unknown' voters. That's in part because you wade into the debate about how to do it, which seems unnecessary if it doesn't materially affect your findings--as in this case — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

To the extent there's a disagreement (and I wouldn't even call it that), it's about a very valid question about when (and potentially how) to allocate voters of 'unknown' race in GA. Whether you do so doesn't affect the conclusion, but it's being used to imply that it does — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

At the end of the day, I don't see any actual disagreement over any of the words in the article or its conclusion: the black share of the electorate dipped, to its lowest level in a while, bc black turnout didn't surge to the same extent as nonblack turnout — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 2, 2020 Hibernated