Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 3, 2022

Created

Fri Nov 20 12:37:56 +0000 2020

Likes

2,391

Retweets

184

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

It's particularly remarkable in this case because the jurisdiction in question--Milwaukee--was transparent about how exactly many mail ballots they had to tabulate and when they would be tabulated. There was zero surprise. It's also how they've always done it, including in 2016 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 20, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The 'vote dumps,' OTOH, are an inevitable artifact of how jurisdiction reports their votes in batches, rather than updating their tally vote by vote. There's really nothing you can do to avoid this. Taking issue with it just means you don't believe election results, period — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 20, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

True, this would eliminate 'dumps,' but it would give rise to a new set of conspiracy theories. At a certain point, if you want to reject an election result you'll contrive a way to do it. The 'dumps' argument make it clear we're in that category https://t.co/4cz3s2tTvE — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn One solution is to not report until all votes are in and counted. I don't see why we need this nonsensic… https://t.co/0dFRQ9Ppzq

Posted Nov. 20, 2020 Hibernated