Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted Yes

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 3, 2022

Created

Thu Oct 22 00:10:00 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Unavailable

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

And if you look everywhere else, you've got more of great-for-Biden-IA-like polls (Q in TX, Fox MI, Civiqs MN/NV) than murkier-PA-like number (Fox and LD in WI, DFP in MI, maybe the Ipsos AZ number) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 22, 2020 Deleted Hibernated Just a Typo

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Today's IA phone polls, in contrast, are pretty clear. You've got Biden ahead in a state Clinton lost by 10. You've got a shift toward Biden, on average. And you have firms with relatively limited house effects. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 22, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

And if you look everywhere else, you've got mix of great-for-Biden-IA-like polls (Q in TX, Fox MI, Civiqs MN/NV) than murkier-PA-like number (Fox and LD in WI, DFP in MI, maybe the Ipsos AZ number), and some in between (like every FL poll) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 22, 2020 Deleted Hibernated Just a Typo