Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 3, 2022

Created

Sun Sep 20 11:38:20 +0000 2020

Likes

519

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Let's be honest, the Senate didn't act on Garland and might well act on Trump's selection for a simple reason: Republicans didn't want Obama's judge, they do want Trump's judge, and so they may act on one but not the other. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 20, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

I'd be curious to read--from both sides--about a very simple topic when it comes to this Supreme Court debate: raw political power — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 20, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Under the constitution, this is well within their power! They control the Senate, the constitution gives the Senate the power to confirm nominees, and therefore the Senate confirmed the nominee it wanted but not the other. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 20, 2020 Hibernated