Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 3, 2022

Created

Thu Sep 17 14:26:55 +0000 2020

Likes

138

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Or put differently, if there had been 3 MULaw polls at thend--I'm not sure they all would have been that good for Clinton given the national trend and their other two polls. If there were more high quality polls there, I really do think we might have known something was up — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

In the end, MULaw was Clinton+6. And that was the last and only word on it. But what people might forget is that MULaw had previously shown Clinton up just 4 and 2 in their prior two surveys. After the fact, it makes me wonder whether the final poll was a little hot for Clinton — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

We're not going to have that issue this year. A lot of new, high quality firms have entered the state polling fray, and others have upped their game since '16. I'm not saying that guarantees an accurate average, but it certainly improves the odds — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 17, 2020 Hibernated