Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 3, 2022

Created

Thu Sep 17 14:22:32 +0000 2020

Likes

130

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Speaking personally, my interpretation of the end of the race really hinged on the final MULaw poll, which you can kind of see from this 11/2 article. There just weren't really many other high quality polls in the Midwest from that point onward. https://t.co/0diohu0woA — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

One thing people forget about Wisconsin's huge polling error in 2016 is that there was basically no high-quality polling in town. It was basically MULaw and MULaw alone. As a result, so much of our interpretation of the race hinged on their final poll. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

In the end, MULaw was Clinton+6. And that was the last and only word on it. But what people might forget is that MULaw had previously shown Clinton up just 4 and 2 in their prior two surveys. After the fact, it makes me wonder whether the final poll was a little hot for Clinton — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 17, 2020 Hibernated