Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 26, 2021

Created

Sat Jul 25 14:01:46 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The way around it is to use a density/development based definition, which would make almost all the Sun Belt metros 'suburban.' I think this vision has merit and it also correlates well with vote choice. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 25, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The most coherent critique, IMO, is that this is a very industrial-northeast focused definition of a suburb. There are many Sun Belt metros where the city-limits are basically coterminous with the whole urbanized area, so we would have few no 'san antonio suburbs' — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 25, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

OTOH, this remedy could put big chunks of Seattle, Queens and Detroit and wherever into the 'suburbs.' And for me that's kind of facially unacceptable, at least for this kind of generalized purpose. In this context, I'd settle for calling San Antonio urban. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 25, 2020 Hibernated