Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 8, 2021

Created

Mon Jul 20 17:50:19 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

i think standing at armegeddon has a little bit more of an on-the-ground feel to it that keeps it politically relevant, while 'the republic* for which it stands' may be the more comprehensive and sweeping history? https://t.co/bsOz16wMMC — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn If I only wanted to read one, what are the big differences between the two?

Posted July 20, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

and i'd encourage anyone interested to pick up 'standing at armegeddon' or 'the republican for which it stands,' my two favorite general histories of the period — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 20, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

otoh i think the latter only goes to 1896, which may or may not be what you want — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 20, 2020 Hibernated