Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted Yes

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 6, 2021

Created

Wed Jun 10 14:42:20 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Unavailable

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@RachelBitecofer look it's just not about you--if it was then these articles/tweets, all from before i knew you, just wouldn't exist. https://t.co/o4ToVarjgU https://t.co/nQVGmseZsX https://t.co/BCXG6Jw5Ai https://t.co/Y5JKELogS7 https://t.co/7jndMCBes1 — PolitiTweet.org

2) I'm still not clear on why it's easy for them to do it? It's easy to say that a party should boost turnout. It's… https://t.co/1dv9bNMtAM

Posted June 10, 2020 Deleted Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@RachelBitecofer no one was talking about your research, and honestly i'm not sure what research you've done that's salient to it, other than a voter file analysis of 2014 v 2018. no one disputes that turnout was one factor of many factors that helps explain the yuge swing between those contests — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 10, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

@RachelBitecofer look, it's just not about you. i've been talking about this for years, yielding tweets/articles like these well before i knew you. https://t.co/BCXG6Jw5Ai https://t.co/o4ToVarjgU https://t.co/nQVGmseZsX https://t.co/Y5JKELogS7 — PolitiTweet.org

Turnout can always be better. But turnout in FL/PA was very strong--higher than '12--and Clinton lost because Obama voters flipped.

Posted June 10, 2020 Hibernated