Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 6, 2021

Created

Mon Jun 08 19:58:12 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

There are no substantive points. There's an assertion that there are too few Republicans. Could be--always could be--but there's no actual evidence. The '16 exit isn't relevant, and his opinion doesn't have any independent weight https://t.co/W5GQCMK6In — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn Do you agree with the substantive points made by John McLaughlin in the memo though?

Posted June 8, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

hey, that VA07 primary could have been tough to poll! these house races were not, and we know because we polled several of these same races at about the same time and had an average error that was appx. 15 points better than this https://t.co/YANgFAyRJ3 — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn it is the nerdiest thing you could do to pick their overall adjusted 2018 rating rather than the thing everyone remembers

Posted June 8, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Here's another memo where McLaughlin said a poll was wrong: FL-26, where he contended that our final NYT/Siena poll (DMP (D)+1) fails the simplest of stress tests. He had Curbelo (R)+10 there. The final result was DMP+2 https://t.co/uQzhYoxZeu — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 8, 2020 Hibernated