Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 14, 2020

Created

Thu Apr 02 14:27:24 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

In many comparisons, we'd just learn how much of a geography is unaffected, and that's not what we're interested in. So it may be unusually useful to use the most direct comparisons we can: metro to metro, not just nation to nation but nations/regions of similar pop/densit/size — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 2, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

IE: coronavirus cases don't just spread evenly throughout a country, they spread throughout communities, leading to metro-area type clusters. So what does it mean to compare Lombardy to the US, even on a per capita basis, when huge parts of the US remain largely unaffected? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 2, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

To me, the best comparisons are metro-level. Metros correspond with the natural extent of community spread. It corresponds with the availability of easily shared health resources. If we go above that, the right comparison may depend a bit on what we want to learn — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 2, 2020 Hibernated