Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 21, 2020

Created

Fri Feb 07 03:51:42 +0000 2020

Likes

291

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

And look, I literally can’t explain to you why they did it, other than inertia. It made no sense once they reported a pop vote and bound pledged delegates to precinct caucuses. But the whole game was played assuming this was the goal and you can’t ignore that — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 7, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

The Iowa Democrats decided not to use it. It's not my place to say someone 'won' the Iowa Dems' game by any measure other than the rules they set for it, whatever I may think of those rules https://t.co/KOrWw2IgXB — PolitiTweet.org

@Nate_Cohn Hey what's the problem the a popular vote?

Posted Feb. 7, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Or, I should say, I can’t ignore that. You can, and that’s totally justifiable. But I’m covering someone else’s contest here, I’m not an organizer, participant or a contestant. And I really don’t believe I can come in and judge by my own measure, whatever the merits of the game — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 7, 2020 Hibernated