Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Sept. 30, 2020

Created

Sat Jan 04 19:54:47 +0000 2020

Likes

136

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Looking again at my replies, I'm surprised how many people seem to doubt the importance of the increase in cost. I mean, the cost of our Oct. 2019 polls in PA/FL/NC was basically 2.5x greater per respondent than our PA/FL/NC polls in Oct. 2016. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Fortunately, I'd guess this drought will be over soon enough. I think it's reasonable to think that some firms that are going to hit this early January window--early enough so that they can come back for a final poll the weekend before. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 4, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

There's a very reason for this: caller ID allowed and the proliferation of spam calls encouraged many voters to decline calls from unknown numbers. That means pollsters need to make more calls, which means paying for more hours of work. No conspiracy or oligarchic ploy required — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 5, 2020 Hibernated