Nate Cohn

@Nate_Cohn ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 28, 2020

Created

Thu Jun 13 19:18:07 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Since no one actually reads articles anymore, I'll pull out a few fun things: The Bullock respondent had a weight of .77; it needed to be at least 1.83 (as some respondents were) to make the debate, or he could have had a second fairly typical respondent — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 13, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

Looks like Bullock came within one respondent of qualifying in the Monmouth poll of Nevada. His respondent didn't get enough weight https://t.co/eIVkEraMGv — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 13, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn

I also think MT is a subtle but real disadvantage in the fight for 1%. If, say, Klobuchar has 30% of the vote in MN, that's probably enough for .5% on average (since MN is 1.7% of the US) which rounds to 1% MT, however, is 0.3% of the population, so it gets him very little — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 13, 2019 Hibernated