Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Wed Mar 07 16:36:33 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

27/ The answer is that *Trump* could, were he a named party to the contract, make that claim; *Cohen*, as Trump's attorney and agent, could, were he in his own person a party to the contract, make that claim; but what *possible* authority does "EC, LLC" have to make such a claim? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

26/ So—keeping in mind Cohen's defense to this suit for declaratory judgment will be that Trump wasn't a party to the contract (paragraph 1.1 notwithstanding)—how in the world will he explain 2.2(b) "[Trump] claims that he has been damaged..." How can "EC, LLC" make such a claim? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

28/ So what happens if Daniels says yes, I took the money, I have "unclean hands"—a legal doctrine that prohibits challenging a contract you pretended was valid so you could benefit from it—but (but!) the *reason* I took that money is I *believed Trump was bound by the contract*? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated