Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Wed Mar 07 16:38:39 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

28/ So what happens if Daniels says yes, I took the money, I have "unclean hands"—a legal doctrine that prohibits challenging a contract you pretended was valid so you could benefit from it—but (but!) the *reason* I took that money is I *believed Trump was bound by the contract*? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

27/ The answer is that *Trump* could, were he a named party to the contract, make that claim; *Cohen*, as Trump's attorney and agent, could, were he in his own person a party to the contract, make that claim; but what *possible* authority does "EC, LLC" have to make such a claim? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

29/ In this view, the question becomes, did Cohen outsmart himself? By ensuring Trump *wasn't* a party to the contract and hiding his own identity (as EC LLC) did he falsely represent that EC LLC had the legal authority to make representations for Trump or bind him to a contract? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated