Seth Abramson

@SethAbramson ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 12, 2019

Created

Wed Mar 07 16:35:23 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

26/ So—keeping in mind Cohen's defense to this suit for declaratory judgment will be that Trump wasn't a party to the contract (paragraph 1.1 notwithstanding)—how in the world will he explain 2.2(b) "[Trump] claims that he has been damaged..." How can "EC, LLC" make such a claim? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

25/ What happens if Daniels signs the contract reasonably believing Trump is a party, and/or reasonably believing EC LLC has legal authority to make representations for Trump and bind Trump legally, when it fact it has no such authority, it's just Cohen trying to "protect" Trump? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Seth Abramson @SethAbramson

27/ The answer is that *Trump* could, were he a named party to the contract, make that claim; *Cohen*, as Trump's attorney and agent, could, were he in his own person a party to the contract, make that claim; but what *possible* authority does "EC, LLC" have to make such a claim? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 7, 2018 Hibernated