Brendan Carr

@BrendanCarrFCC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 23, 2021

Created

Wed Dec 16 03:15:04 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

When pressed, some stakeholders will concede that reforming Section 230 along these lines will not impinge on First Amendment rights. Instead, they argue, it will raise litigation costs. ... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020

Preceded By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

In contrast, take downs would continue to benefit from Section 230 but only to the extent those decisions satisfy the statutory standard Congress codified in (c)(2). There’s a higher statutory bar for take downs than for decisions to leave content up. So more speech, not less. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020

Followed By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

There’s plenty of room to debate the merits of that claim, but that is a very different contention than suggesting that Section 230 reform cannot proceed without violating the First Amendment. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020