Brendan Carr

@BrendanCarrFCC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 23, 2021

Created

Wed Dec 16 03:13:22 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

In contrast, take downs would continue to benefit from Section 230 but only to the extent those decisions satisfy the statutory standard Congress codified in (c)(2). There’s a higher statutory bar for take downs than for decisions to leave content up. So more speech, not less. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020

Preceded By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

This also pierces the claim that Section 230 reform will result in less speech, not more. Leaving speech up would continue to benefit from the protections conferred by Section 230(c)(1)’s famous “26 words.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020

Followed By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

When pressed, some stakeholders will concede that reforming Section 230 along these lines will not impinge on First Amendment rights. Instead, they argue, it will raise litigation costs. ... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020