Brendan Carr

@BrendanCarrFCC ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked March 23, 2021

Created

Wed Dec 16 03:16:14 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

There’s plenty of room to debate the merits of that claim, but that is a very different contention than suggesting that Section 230 reform cannot proceed without violating the First Amendment. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020

Preceded By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

When pressed, some stakeholders will concede that reforming Section 230 along these lines will not impinge on First Amendment rights. Instead, they argue, it will raise litigation costs. ... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020

Followed By

Brendan Carr @BrendanCarrFCC

@joshuamking It wouldn’t need to benefit from 230. You always have a First Amendment right to take down speech. Whether a particular take down is protected, *not only by the 1st Amend* but also by the additional statutory provisions in Section 230 is the question. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 16, 2020