Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 16, 2019

Created

Sun Sep 25 13:52:30 +0000 2016

Likes

225

Retweets

214

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

First, Obama was overperforming in swing states. So a 2% national lead was equivalent to 3% Electoral College lead. NOT true for Clinton. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 25, 2016 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Clinton's ~2% lead over Trump is a lot less safe than Obama's was at similar junctures over Romney. Here's why... — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 25, 2016 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

And second, much larger undecided and 3rd party vote this year. Leading 48-46 is considerably safer than leading 42-40. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 25, 2016 Hibernated