Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 11, 2022

Created

Thu Oct 20 23:37:31 +0000 2022

Likes

201

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@mattyglesias That's not quite right because you're not just taking states off the map, you're also informing the model's prior about other states. For example also if you give CO and WA to Ds, it increases their probability quite a bit it removes some "crazy" scenarios from the table. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 20, 2022

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

RT @galendruke: Who wants to talk more about that 32 point rightward shift among independent women in this week's NYT/Siena poll? Great! L… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 20, 2022 Retweet

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@mattyglesias What your scenario tells us is that conditional on there not being a systematic error *favoring* Democrats, Ds are underdogs to keep the Senate. Which, I agree. Some of their 59% chance comes from the probability of a systematic pro-R polling bias or a late momentum shift to Ds. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 20, 2022