Profile Image

Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated No
Last Checked Nov. 1, 2022

Created

Fri Sep 09 17:50:01 +0000 2022

Likes

377

Retweets

17

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Maybe some folks predicted this but I don't think many (would be good to see receipts). A better & more common argument was that some NPI strategies had no endgame or limiting principle, therefore it was important to rebut the technocrats and say "enough is enough" at some point. — PolitiTweet.org

Eric Levitz @EricLevitz

A certain set of folks on here histrionically predicted that Covid-era public health restrictions would remain in f… https://t.co/0rphzZssS3

Posted Sept. 9, 2022

Preceded By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Given current coalitions, you need something like a D+3 or D+4 *popular vote* for each party to win *elections* half the time. So I propose that a D+3 or D+4 popular vote is what a *default" or "neutral" year looks like; NOT the generic ballot being tied (D+0). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2022

Followed By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@MileHighBrendan I think this sort of proves my point though? This guy isn't predicting that strict NPIs will be in place forever. He's saying there's a group of unelected technocrats who would implement them if they could, with the implication that it's important to resist them. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 9, 2022