Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 15, 2020

Created

Tue Nov 24 16:47:31 +0000 2020

Likes

1,848

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Maybe that's OK. "We don't know *how* the election might be stolen, but Trump has expressed a lot of dangerous ideas and parts of the system haven't been tested, so we need to keep our guard up". That's totally reasonable. But there's a fine line between vigilance and panic. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 24, 2020

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Namely, there was a lack of precision to many of them; they didn't explain the mechanisms by which the election would be stolen. Often they were a bit Underwear Gnomes-ish: 1. Trump wants to steal the election 2. ???* 3. ELECTION STOLEN * Or "THE COURTS!!" — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 24, 2020

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Which was always an implausible plan that was extremely unlikely to succeed. To the extent that's the scenario people were banking on, it does look like an overreaction. There was never any explanation of the doctrine or pretext that courts would use to stop the count. — PolitiTweet.org

This is embrassing. It was all public. The Trump plan was to sue to stop the count of legal cast votes to stay ahea… https://t.co/dkZlNgSkoI

Posted Nov. 24, 2020