Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 14, 2020

Created

Tue Nov 24 16:47:31 +0000 2020

Likes

1,510

Retweets

106

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Namely, there was a lack of precision to many of them; they didn't explain the mechanisms by which the election would be stolen. Often they were a bit Underwear Gnomes-ish: 1. Trump wants to steal the election 2. ???* 3. ELECTION STOLEN * Or "THE COURTS!!" — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 24, 2020

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

It didn't come close to succeeding. But I don't think people should inherently be criticized for having pointed out that a high-impact but low-probability event—Trump stealing the election—deserved attention. ... With that said, there were issues with *some* of these claims. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 24, 2020

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Maybe that's OK. "We don't know *how* the election might be stolen, but Trump has expressed a lot of dangerous ideas and parts of the system haven't been tested, so we need to keep our guard up". That's totally reasonable. But there's a fine line between vigilance and panic. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 24, 2020