Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 27, 2021

Created

Sat Sep 19 18:21:14 +0000 2020

Likes

229

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

4. Finally, he could say, "we'll, will see". But, people would probably (correctly) assume that means "we'll confirm anyway". Also, I'm not sure spitting the baby in that way avoids some combination of the other problems, or if the ambiguity does say Susan Collins any favors. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

3. If he says "then it would be up to the Democrats" ... but re-negs and tries to confirm anyway ... OK, maybe? But that could be wildly unpopular, might lose a couple of institutionalist senators, and could trigger retaliation from Democrats (e.g. expanding the court). — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

RT @baseballot: YouGov is already out with a SCOTUS poll: Voters think 51–42% that Trump should not appoint a new justice before 2021. If… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 19, 2020 Retweet Hibernated