Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 27, 2021

Created

Fri Aug 14 13:36:18 +0000 2020

Likes

230

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Also keep in mind that these probabilities are drawn from distributions that stretch out on the tails. It doesn't take a lot to go from say 50% to 54% (so those forecasts are ~identical) but it DOES take a lot to go from 95% to 99% (so those are quite different) https://t.co/HbSJcpbW0Y — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 14, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Maybe it's my background as a poker player, but distinguishing between a 28% chance and a 11% chance ... you'd be thrilled to get your money in with that sort of edge. Elections are different, and there's much higher model specification uncertainty, but it's still fairly big. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 14, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

In that sense, the best tip-off that the forecasts are different is they have Biden at 97% to win the popular vote, and have sometimes been as high as 98% (and 99% before they revised their model) whereas we are at 82%. You're getting up to 97-98%, you're getting VERY confident. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 14, 2020 Hibernated